Current:Home > StocksHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases -Horizon Finance School
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View
Date:2025-04-27 06:43:00
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (99)
Related
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- State Department offers to share classified dissent cable on Afghanistan withdrawal with key lawmakers
- Pakistani transgender activists will appeal Shariah court ruling against law aimed at protecting them
- Rare, deadly albino cobra slithers into home during rainstorm in India
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Tonga volcano eruption put holes in the atmosphere, sent plasma bubbles to space and disrupted satellites
- The U.S.' top general reflects on the changing face of war, 79 years after D-Day
- Why Blac Chyna Quit Degrading OnlyFans Career Amid New Personal Chapter
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Ukrainian nuclear plant is extremely vulnerable, U.N. official warns, after 7th power outage of war
Ranking
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- VP Harris becomes the first woman to give a West Point commencement speech
- The father of the cellphone predicts we'll have devices embedded in our skin next
- Grimes Shares Update on the Name of Her and Elon Musk's Daughter
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Codex Sassoon, oldest near-complete Hebrew Bible, sold at auction for $38.1 million
- Why it's hard for Arabic-speaking parents to read to their kids, and a New York mom's quest for a solution
- Ukrainian nuclear plant is extremely vulnerable, U.N. official warns, after 7th power outage of war
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Designer in Supreme Court ruling cited client who denies making wedding site request
The Beatles will release a final record, using John Lennon's voice via an AI assist
Transcript: Dr. Scott Gottlieb on Face the Nation, May 21, 2023
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Police in Australia accused of using Taser on 95-year-old woman
As U.S. abortion laws tighten, more Americans are looking overseas for access. Here's what's happening.
One Direction's Liam Payne says he's over 100 days sober: I feel amazing